Treatment of hallux rigidus with percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: a case series with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis is an option for the treatment of hallux rigidus in more advanced cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results at least 2 years after percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in patients with hallux rigidus. METHODS: This is a case series of consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in patients with hallux rigidus grades III and IV with a minimum of 24 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The primary outcome was clinical assessment using the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS). Secondary outcomes included American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, patient satisfaction, complications, and bone healing (radiographic analysis). RESULTS: Between August 2017 and February 2020, 29 feet (24 patients) underwent percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis. The mean follow-up was 38.4 (range 24-54) months. There was an improvement in the pain (VAS) from 7.8 to 0.6 (p < 0.001) and in the AOFAS score from 49.9 to 83.6 (p < 0.001). There was a rate of bone union of 82.8% and screw removal of 13.8%. All patients considered the result to be excellent or good. CONCLUSION: The treatment of grade III and IV hallux rigidus with percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis demonstrated high patient satisfaction and significantly improves in clinical outcomes but the nonunion rate was higher than reported outcomes for open 1st metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplant for Degenerative Joint Disease of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint: A Case Report.

The first metatarsophalangeal joint is the most common location for arthritis in the foot. Pain and limited mobility associated with arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint are the hallmarks of this disease. Treatments include shoe modification, orthotic devices, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, injections, physical therapy, and surgery. Surgery has been the most perplexing, with surgical treatments ranging from simple ostectomies to fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Implant arthroplasty, with its various designs and techniques, has yet to be proven as the definitive solution for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis or hallux limitus (unlike the knee and hip). Interpositional arthroplasty and tissue-engineered cartilage grafts also have limitations when dealing with osteoarthritis and hallux limitus of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. In this case report, we present a 45-year-old woman with arthritis of the left first metatarsophalangeal joint who underwent surgical intervention by means of a frozen osteochondral allograft transplant to the first metatarsal head.

Converting 1st metatarsophalangeal joint fusion to interposition arthroplasty. Mid-term results of a case series.

BACKGROUND: Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint has been considered as the gold standard for treatment of advanced hallux rigidus. The main disadvantage is the restriction of movement which may not be as favorable as anticipated by several patients. The purpose of this study was to report clinical and functional outcomes on patients who were treated with interposition arthroplasty after a 1st MTP joint fusion which had not fulfilled their expectations. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2014, 11 patients who were not satisfied by 1st MTP joint fusion for hallux rigidus, underwent a conversion to interposition arthroplasty. After removal of hardware, the fusion was taken down by removal of a bone block from the fused joint. A fascia lata graft was interposed. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, range of motion of the first MTP joint, length of first ray, and patients' satisfaction were recorded as the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Mean age was 34 years (range, 24-42 y). The mean ± SD AOFAS/H/MTP/IP score was 61 ± 5.5 preoperatively, 90.5 ± 4.5 at one year and 92 ± 4 at five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean ± SD VAS-FA score was 91 ± 3.5 preoperatively, 94.5 ± 2.5 at one year and 95 ± 2.5 at five years postoperatively (p > 0.05). Mean ROM at the final follow-up was 58° ± 5° of dorsiflexion and 27° ± 4° of plantarflexion. No inter- or postoperative complications were encountered. The length of the hallux was decreased by a mean of 1.5 mm (range, 1-2.5 mm). All patients were satisfied with the overall outcome, walking ability and shoe-wear convenience and graded their condition as excellent (9 cases) or good (2 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Converting a 1st MTP joint fusion to interposition arthroplasty with a fascia lata allograft could be a safe alternative with promising results in selected cases especially in relatively young and athletic population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV retrospective case series.

Factors Associated With Nonunion in Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is the current treatment of choice for symptomatic advanced hallux rigidus and moderate-to-severe hallux valgus. There are different methods to perform arthrodesis, yet no consensus on the best approach. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects of preoperative and postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA), joint preparation and fixation technique, and postoperative immobilization on the incidence of nonunion. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed that included 794 patients. Univariate and multiple logistic regression was conducted to determine associations between joint preparation, fixation techniques, postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, and pre- and postoperative HVA with nonunion. RESULTS: Nonunion incidence was 15.2%, with 11.1% symptomatic and revised. Joint preparation using hand instruments (OR 3.75, CI 1.90-7.42) and convex/concave reamers (OR 2.80, CI 1.52-5.16) were associated with greater odds of a nonunion compared to planar cuts. Joint fixation with crossed screws was associated with greater odds of nonunion (OR 2.00, CI 1.11-3.42), as was greater preoperative HVA (OR 1.02, CI 1.00-1.03). However, the latter effect disappeared after inclusion of postoperative HVA in the model, with a small association identified between residual postoperative HVA and nonunion (OR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.08). Similarly, we found an association between odds of nonunion and higher body weight (OR 1.02, CI 1.01-1.04) but not of body mass index. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with planar cuts and fixation with a plate and interfragmentary screw is associated with the lowest odds of resulting in a nonunion. Higher body weight and greater preoperative HVA were associated with slight increase in rates of nonunion. It is crucial to properly correct the hallux valgus deformity during surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case control study.

First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis for Hallux Rigidus and Hallux Valgus: A Comparison of Patient Reported and Clinical Outcomes.

Few prior studies have compared the patient reported outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis between hallux rigidus and hallux valgus patients. Furthermore, we sought to examine the impact of postoperative radiographic hallux alignment on outcomes scores within each group. A retrospective review of 98 patients who a received primary metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis from January 2010 to March 2020. Clinical complications including nonunion were collected. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function, PROMIS Pain Interference, and the foot function index (FFI) revised short form scores were obtained via telephone. Patients were grouped based on review of preoperative radiographs of the foot and this grouping 37 hallux rigidus and 61 hallux valgus patients. Clinical and patient reported outcomes were compared between these pathologies. No differences in the rate of wound complications, radiographic union, and revision surgery were found between the 2 subgroups. At a median of 2.4 years (3.9 IQR) postoperatively, PROMIS and FFI scores did not vary by pathology group. For both groups, PROMIS scores were similar to the general population of the United States. The postoperative first MTP dorsiflexion angle in the hallux rigidus group was correlated with decreased FFI Pain, FFI Total, and PROMIS Pain Interference domain scores (|r| ≥ 0.40, p < .05 for all). When performing MTP arthrodesis in patients with hallux rigidus, increasing the first MTP dorsiflexion angle may correlate with improved intermediate term patient reported outcomes. However, further studies will need to be done to confirm this theoretical relationship.

Synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty versus cheilectomy for the treatment of hallux rigidus.

Degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, hallux rigidus, is the most common type of arthritis of the foot, affecting nearly 2.5% of the population over the age of 50. Hallux rigidus can be treated surgically with either Cheilectomy or Synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) hemiarthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes from a single institution on the treatment of hallux rigidus using cheilectomy and SCI hemiarthroplasty. Between 2012 and 2020, 49 patients underwent either a SCI (Polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels) hemiarthroplasty or Cheilectomy for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Functional scores were assessed pre and postoperatively using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle scoring System (AOFAS) and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score survey (FAOS). Plantar and Dorsal range of motion was also assessed pre and postoperatively. Outcomes, complications, and any reoperations were recorded for all patients. Mean pre-op AOFAS for Cheilectomy and SCI were 49.6 and 54.8, respectively, compared to 85.3 and 89.7, respectively, after surgery (p value < 0.05). Mean pre-op Dorsal range of motion (ROM) for Cheilectomy and SCI were 24.0 and 26.0 degrees, respectively, compared to 38.0 and 42.6 degrees, respectively, after surgery (p value < 0.05). SCI hemiarthroplasty patients had higher AOFAS and dorsal ROM at the latest follow up (p value < 0.05). Synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) hemiarthroplasty and cheilectomy both offer promising results and remain viable treatment options to decrease pain, improve function, and maintain motion for hallux rigidus. SCI hemiarthroplasty may offer superior range of motion and functional outcomes than cheilectomy for hallux rigidus. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: 3.

A Novel Plating System for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Hybrid and Traditional Locking Plate Constructs.

BACKGROUND: Dorsal plate fixation is commonly used for first metatarsophalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) arthrodesis and plate design continues to evolve. A new staple compression plate (SCP) design attempts to utilize the continuous compression of a nitinol staple across the fusion site while simultaneously providing the stability of a dorsal locked plate. Herein, we compare the radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes of 1st MTPJ joint arthrodesis using 2 dorsal locking plate constructs including a novel SCP construct. METHODS: Forty-four patients who underwent 1st MTPJ arthrodesis between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. There were 2 group cohorts. Group 1 cohort included 23 patients who received a CrossRoads Extremity SCP, and Group 2 cohort included 21 patients who received a Stryker dorsal locking precontoured titanium plate (LPP). All patients were evaluated with radiographs, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Information System (PROMIS) outcome scores, and Foot Function Index (FFI). RESULTS: The complication and union rates did not vary between groups with a fusion rate of 95.7% in the SCP group and 90.5 % in the LPP group. Similarly, we found no significant differences in PROMIS or FFI scores between the SCP and LPP plates. CONCLUSION: Use of either dorsal locking plate construct for 1st MTPJ arthrodesis was associated with high union rates and comparable functional outcomes. As locked plate technology continues to evolve for 1st MTPJ arthrodesis, it is important that clinical outcomes are reported. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Does metatarsus primus elevatus really exist in hallux rigidus? A weightbearing CT case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Elevated first metatarsal, Metatarsus primus elevatus (MPE), has been a topic of controversy. Recent studies have supported a significantly elevated first metatarsal in hallux rigidus on weight-bearing radiographs (WBR). However, conventional radiographs have limitations for accurate measurement. Our objective was to comparatively assess MPE and other variables which can affect the spatial relationship of the forefoot in the HR group compared to controls using weight-bearing CT (WBCT). METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective, case-control study, 25 patients (30 feet) with symptomatic HR and 30 controls were selected. WBCT parameters were measured by two independent investigators. Inter-observer reliabilities were assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). MPE was evaluated by measuring the direct distance between 1st and 2nd metatarsals. Independent t tests were performed to compare the two groups. A threshold of MPE to diagnose HR was calculated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: HR groups had increased hallux valgus angle (HVA) (8.52° in control vs 11.98° in HR) and MPE (2.92 vs 5.09 mm), decreased 1st metatarsal declination angle (21.09° vs 19.07°) 1st/2nd metatarsal declination ratio (87.45 vs 79.71) indicating elevated first metatarsal compared to controls. Dorsal translation of the first metatarsal at the first tarsometatarsal joint was observed in 21 (70%) patients of the HR group when defined as a step-off or discontinuation of the curvature along the first TMT joint. The threshold of MPE for diagnosis of HR was 4.19 mm with 77% sensitivity and 77% specificity. CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed a significantly elevated first metatarsal in the HR group compared to controls on WBCT. A MPE greater than 4.19 mm was found to be diagnostic for symptomatic HR. Significant number of patients in the HR group (70%) had dorsal translation of the first metatarsal at the first TMT joint which can contribute to increased MPE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study demonstrated significantly increased MPE in HR on WBCT and MPE greater than 4.19 mm on WBCT can be used as a diagnostic threshold for HR.

First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis outcomes for hallux rigidus versus hallux valgus.

BACKGROUND: This study compared radiographic and functional patient outcomes of 1st MTP arthrodesis between hallux rigidus (HR) and hallux valgus (HV) cohorts. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at an academic medical center on patients who underwent 1st MTP arthrodesis during 2009-2021. In total, 136 patients (148 feet: HR=57, HV=47, combined=44) met the inclusion criteria of minimum three-month follow-up (mean=1.25 years, range=0.25-6.14 years). Data collection included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographic markers, and complication and reoperation rates. RESULTS: PROMs improved overall, with HV patients significantly improving the least. The HR group had a significantly smaller improvement in HV angle (HR=-3.6, HV=-17, Combined=-15 p < .001), intermetatarsal angle (H=-0.16, HV=-2.8, Combined=-2.6 p < .001), and 1st-5th metatarsal width (HR=-0.98, HV=-4.6, Combined=-4.6, p < .001). Complication and reoperation rates did not differ by group. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of 1st MTP arthrodesis does not appear to differ between diagnostic indications of hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, or both. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Validation of the Artificial Floor Technique in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Patient function after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) relies on proper positioning of the first MTPJ. To maximize the likelihood of good postoperative function, the dorsiflexion angle, referred to as the fusion sagittal angle, should range between 20° and 30°, corresponding to 10° to 15° of dorsiflexion off the weightbearing axis. However, achieving appropriate sagittal alignment intraoperatively is challenging. The artificial floor technique (AFT) uses a rigid, flat surface to simulate the weightbearing position of the foot intraoperatively to accurately position the first MTPJ without fluoroscopy. This technique has been previously described and is commonly used but, to our knowledge, it has never been validated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is the AFT a valid and repeatable technique for positioning the fusion sagittal angle between 20° and 30° of dorsiflexion from the first metatarsal? (2) Does the fusion sagittal angle obtained using the AFT vary with foot size? METHODS: In this retrospective study, a search was performed using Current Procedural Terminology codes for patients undergoing first MTPJ arthrodesis by one surgeon between June 2012 and June 2020. The surgical technique used during this time did not vary and consisted of the use of a rigid, flat, sterile surface. The entire foot was placed flat on the surface, simulating the weightbearing position and allowing for an evaluation of the fusion sagittal angle of the first MTPJ. The target sagittal alignment was achieved when the soft tissue of the plantar surface at the distal-most aspect of the proximal phalanx was measured (using a sterile ruler) as 1 cm off the artificial floor. The recommended fusion sagittal angle falls within a range of 20° to 30°, which allows for 1-mm to 2-mm variations in measuring the elevation of the proximal phalanx off the artificial floor. Fixation was achieved with two 2.8-mm threaded, double-pointed Steinmann pins placed through the intramedullary canal of the proximal and distal phalanges and into the first metatarsal. Once fixation was achieved, the fusion sagittal angle was confirmed with the AFT without using fluoroscopy. Postoperatively, patients were allowed to bear weight fully on their heels in a postoperative, rigid-soled shoe. During the study period, 117 patients (135 feet) underwent first MTPJ arthrodesis utilizing the AFT for either first MTPJ arthritis/hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, or inflammatory arthropathy. Of those, we considered patients with preoperative AP and lateral weightbearing radiographs and patients with AP and lateral weightbearing radiographs at 3 months postoperatively after the removal of the internal fixation construct as eligible for analysis. Based on these criteria, 84% (113 of 135) of feet were included in the final radiographic analysis. Sixteen percent (22 of 135) of the feet were excluded because postoperative radiographs demonstrating the removal of the internal fixation construct were absent from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) in these cases. The length of the whole foot, first metatarsal, and proximal phalanx were measured on preoperative weightbearing radiographs. In addition, fusion sagittal angles were measured on weightbearing radiographs after removal of internal fixation construct at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively (mean 3.5 ± 2.2 months). No patients were lost to follow-up before obtaining those radiographs. Two qualified reviewers independently evaluated each radiograph. We ascertained inter- and intraobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). We determined whether the fusion sagittal angle obtained using the AFT varied with foot size by using a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: In the entire study group, the mean fusion sagittal angle using the AFT was 27° ± 4°. The interobserver ICC of the fusion sagittal angle measurements was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 0.97; p < 0.001). The intraobserver ICC for reviewer 1 was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97; p < 0.001) and the intraobserver ICC for reviewer 2 was 0.97 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.98; p < 0.001). Ninety-one percent (103 of 113) of the study group fell within the acceptable range of 20° to 30° ± 2°. The multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that the preoperative lengths of the whole foot (ß =-0.05 [95% CI -0.12 to 0.02]; p = 0.16), proximal phalanx (ß =-0.13 [95% CI -0.46 to 0.20]; p = 0.44), and first metatarsal (ß = 0.13 [95% CI -0.10 to 0.35]; p = 0.27) were not independently associated with the postoperative fusion sagittal angle. CONCLUSION: The AFT allows for accurate and reproducible positioning of the first MTPJ within the appropriate functional range of dorsiflexion, regardless of foot size. Additionally, this technique can be performed without fluoroscopy and so avoids radiation exposure to the patient and the surgical team. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Keller's arthroplasty for hallux rigidus: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Several surgical procedures have been described to treat hallux rigidus. Keller arthroplasty is a joint-sacrificing procedure proposed in 1904. Considering the current trends to mini-invasiveness and the debate about the technique's suitability, this review intends to state Keller arthroplasty results and the conditions where it could be still adopted in the treatment of hallux rigidus. METHODS: Selected articles were reviewed to extract: population data, surgical indications, different surgical techniques, clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Seventeen retrospective studies were selected, counting 508 patients. Mean age at surgery was 55 years. Patients were affected by moderate-severe hallux rigidus. Three modified Keller arthroplasty were identified. Good clinical and radiological outcomes were reported. Metatarsalgia was the most frequent complication (12%). CONCLUSION: Despite for many authors KA seems a viable surgical treatment for middle aged and elderly patients affected by moderate-severe hallux rigidus, the available literature provides little evidence on the real efficacy and safety of the technique. A non-negligible percentage of complications may occur, and therefore is essential to set correct indications through an accurate patients' selection.

Evaluation of Radiographic Features Including Metatarsus Primus Elevatus in Hallux Rigidus.

The etiology of hallux rigidus remains a controversial issue in foot and ankle surgery, i.e., the relationship between metatarsus primus elevatus (MPE) and hallux rigidus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate several radiographic parameters including first metatarsal elevation in patients with hallux rigidus compared to a matched control group. A retrospective case control study was performed including 50 feet, 25 feet with and 25 feet without hallux rigidus. In the patients with hallux rigidus, the first metatarsal was more elevated than in the control group (8.3 ± 1.7 mm vs 3.0 ± 2.0 mm, p < .001) and in 60% of patients with hallux rigidus MPE was diagnosed, compared to zero patients in the control group (p < .001). The lateral 1 to 2 intermetatarsal angle was higher in patients with hallux rigidus (3.6 ± 2.5 vs -0.7 ± 2.8; p < .001). The first metatarsal declination angle was not different between the 2 groups. Intraclass correlation coefficient between 2 observers for measuring the first metatarsal elevation was 0.929 (p < .001). In the current study, increased elevation of the first metatarsal, a higher incidence of MPE and increased lateral 1 to 2 intermetatarsal angle were found in patients with hallux rigidus compared to the control group. These findings support the theory of an association between MPE and hallux rigidus. Further high reliability of first metatarsal elevation measurement was found in our study.

Interpositional Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review.

Hallux rigidus is the most common arthritic condition of the foot. Interpositional arthroplasty (IPA) is indicated for advanced-stage hallux rigidus and attempts to maintain joint motion through insertion of a biologic spacer into the joint. However, the data evaluating the effectiveness of IPA are limited. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the outcomes of IPA in the treatment of hallux rigidus. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Outcomes collected and analyzed included: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (HMI) score, visual analogue scale score, short-form 36 score, range of motion (ROM), radiographic parameters, and postoperative complications. The level and quality of clinical evidence were recorded and assessed. Sixteen studies with a total of 428 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The mean AOFAS-HMI score improved from 51.6 ± 10.1 (range 35.0-64.2) preoperatively to 86.0 ± 7.7 (range 71.6-95.4) postoperatively (p ≤ .001) at weighted mean follow-up of 58.0 ± 34.5 (range 16.5-135.6) months. The preoperative weighted mean total ROM was 39.3° ± 9.6° (range 24.2-49.9) and the postoperative weighted mean total ROM was 61.5° ± 4.8° (range 54.0-66.5) (p ≤ .001). The complication rate was 21.5% with metatarsalgia as the most commonly reported complication. One study was level 3 and 15 studies were level 4 clinical evidence. This systematic review demonstrates improvement in functional and ROM outcomes following IPA procedure at mid-term follow-up. The procedure however has a moderate complication rate. In addition, there is a low level and quality of evidence in the current literature with inconsistent reporting of data.

Multiplanar instability of the first tarsometatarsal joint in hallux valgus and hallux rigidus patients: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Hypermobility of the first ray has been considered associated with various forefoot diseases including hallux valgus (HV) and hallux rigidus (HR). Weightbearing CT scan can be a reliable method for analysis of the first tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. Our objective was to comparatively investigate signs of instability of the first TMT joint on weightbearing CT between three groups (control, HV, and HR). METHODS: In this single-centre, retrospective, case-control study, 27 HV patients (30 feet; mean age 54.2 years), 26 HR patients (30 feet; mean age 56.6 years), and 30 controls (30 feet; mean age; 43 years) were enrolled. Measurements of signs of instability were performed in multiplanes including first TMT angle, dorsal translation of the first metatarsal (M1) at the first TMT joint, plantar distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and M1 in sagittal plane, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA) in axial plane, rotational profiles of C1 and M1 in coronal plane. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and chi-square test were performed to compare each parameter between the three groups. Interobserver reliabilities were assessed using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The HV group had significantly increased first TMT angle (0.23° in controls, 1.15° in HV, 0.19° in HR, p < 0.001), HVA (7.52°, 33.50°, 11.21°, p < 0.001), IMA (9.46°, 16.98°, 11.87°, p < 0.001), C1-M1 angle (22.44°, 29.46°, 23.74°, p < 0.001), and rotational profile of the distal M1 (7.06°, 17.88°, 9.85°, p < 0.001) compared with the control and HR groups. Dorsal translation of M1 (23% in controls, 63% in HV, 70% in HR, p < 0.001) was frequently found in the HV and HR groups with significantly increased plantar distance (0.37 mm, 1.14 mm, 1.46 mm, p < 0.001) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplanar instability of the first TMT joint was confirmed using weightbearing CT in HV and HR groups compared with controls. HV group demonstrated instability mainly in sagittal and axial planes; HR group had sagittal instability predominantly. Our measurement of rotational instability at the first TMT joint was not able to detect differences between groups. A surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint can be an option to address HV and HR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: First ray hypermobility at the first TMT joint is an important consideration when addressing HV and HR, a surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint should be taken in consideration as an option.

Reliability of the Radiographic Measurement of the Hallux Interphalangeal Angle.

BACKGROUND: The hallux valgus interphalangeus (HVI) deformity has a common association with hallux valgus and hallux rigidus. The HVI is formed by the angle between the long axes of the proximal and distal phalanges. The normal value for this angular deformity in the coronal plane is less than 10°. The aim of this study was to analyze the intra- and inter-observer reliability of measuring the interphalangeal angle by orthopaedic surgeons. This study is the first study to evaluate specifically the reliability and reproducibility of measuring the HVI angle. METHODS: Twenty-one X-ray prints of weightbearing feet constituted a set. Sixteen qualified orthopaedic surgeons were asked to measure the HVI angle of all 21 X-ray images in the set. Three randomized sets were sent to each evaluator at 4-week intervals. After all 3 sets were measured, data were retrieved and statistically analyzed to determine the inter- and intraobserver variability and reliability in the measurement of the HVI angle. Reproducibility of the HVI measurement was assessed using 3 categories, which included the ability to measure the same angle 3 times and achieve: 3° or less, 5° or less, and more than 5° variation. RESULTS: The intraobserver reliability was found to be 5° or less in 85.2% of participants and the interobserver reliability was 81.2%. The researcher did not find significant correlation between the surgeons' level of experience with regard to the reliability of measuring the HVI angle. CONCLUSION: The inter- and intraobserver reliabilities of measuring the HVI angle is 81.2% and 85.2%, respectively. The level of experience of the surgeon does not improve this reliability. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Metallic hemiarthroplasty or arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint as treatment for hallux rigidus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Arthrodesis and metallic hemiarthroplasty are two surgical interventions for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the two operations with regards to patient-reported outcomes, pain reduction, complications and revision rates. METHODS: A systematic literature search identified all relevant studies. The methodological quality was assessed using two validated tools. Data of interest were derived and presented. For non-comparative studies, data was assessed for trends, while for comparative studies pooling statistics were performed. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies were included for analysis. The majority of studies (>75%) reported an AOFAS-HMI score greater than 80 points after both metallic hemiarthroplasty and arthrodesis. The lowest VAS pain score was observed after arthrodesis (weighted mean difference -1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.16 to -1.00 P< 0.00001). Comparable numbers of complications (odds radio 1.48, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.73, P = 0.21, favoring: hemiarthroplasty) and revisions (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.15 P = 0.64, favoring: hemiarthroplasty) were observed after both interventions. The included non-comparative studies seem to confirm these findings of the comparative studies. CONCLUSION: Metallic hemiarthroplasty and arthrodesis have excellent clinical outcomes and acceptable complication- and revision rates. Arthrodesis seems to be superior in pain reduction, while metallic hemiarthroplasty is a suitable alternative for patients performing activities that requires motion in the first metatarsophalangeal joint.

Long-term results of total joint arthroplasty and phalangeal hemiarthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using the ToeFit Plus™ system.

BACKGROUND: This paper compares long term success rate of MTP joint replacement for hallux rigidus. We provide long term results of MTP joint replacement with the use of the ToeFit Plus™ System. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our group consisted of 19 total joint replacements and 12 hemiarthroplasties in 18 and 11 patients respectively, performed between 2005-2009. The average follow-up period was 12.2 years (range 9.8-13.7, SD 1.1) for total arthroplasty group and 11.1 years (range 9.5-13.9, SD 1.7) for hemiarthroplasty group. In all followed patients AOFAS score was calculated along with the range of motion assessment. RESULTS: Average AOFAS score improved from 37 preoperatively to 79 at the time of last follow-up in total arthroplasty group and from 45 to 86 in the hemiarthroplasty group, with consideration to the statistically considerable difference of both groups. The total range of motion improved on average from 14° to the current 32° in patients with total arthroplasty and from 15° to 32° with hemiarthroplasty. The total number of cases that required surgical revision was 7 (37%) in total arthroplasty group and 2 (17%) in hemiarthroplasty group. CONCLUSION: Due to the high percentage of failure that was shown in our long term results, we no longer utilise the ToeFit Plus™ System.

One-year Follow-Up Results with Hydrogel Implant in Therapy of Hallux Rigidus: Case Series with 44 Patients. / Jahresergebnisse eines Hydrogelimplantats in der Therapie des Hallux rigidus: eine Fallserie von 44 Patienten.

BACKGROUND: The Cartiva implant (CI) is being increasingly used in the surgical therapy of hallux rigidus. Despite a growing number of studies, numerous questions regarding patient selection remain unanswered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As part of a retrospective case series with prospective follow-up (average follow-up period: 12 months), a total of 44 patients (male/female = 16/28; mean age at the time of surgery: 55.4 years) with 44 CI were analysed (VAS, EFAS-, AOFAS-score). Using a correlation analysis and a machine learning algorithm, risk factors for therapy failure were investigated. RESULTS: The overall survival rate of the CI was 93% at 12 months. The VAS, EFAS and AOFAS scores showed a significant improvement in comparison to the preoperative condition. The mobility of the metatarsophalangeal joint showed no increase. Patients with a medium osteoarthritis grade and a medium level of clinical restraint showed the greatest improvement in relation to their preoperative condition. CONCLUSION: The CI can be seen as an effective therapy for hallux rigidus. Nonetheless, realistic patient expectations must be communicated.

Crossed Screw Fixation Versus Dorsal Plating for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Multiple fixation techniques for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis have been described with an average fusion rate of 93.5%. This retrospective cohort study assesses the association between crossed screws (vs dorsal plating) and medical comorbidities and the outcome radiographic union. Bivariate tests of association and multivariable logistic regression were employed to assess differences across fixation type and outcomes. We identified 305 patients who underwent a first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis during the study period. Crossed screw fixation was used in 158 (51.8%) patients while dorsal plating (tubular or anatomic locking plate) was used in 147 (48.2%) patients. Dorsal plating was utilized more often in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (p = .019) and history of smoking (p = .044). At 12 weeks post-operatively there were no significant differences in fusion rates between the two groups (crossed screw group = 95.3% vs dorsal plate group (referent) = 93.5%, Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-4.26). Not smoking was associated with a greater odds of fusion at 12 weeks (96.2% for nonsmokers vs 75.0% for smokers (referent), AOR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.28). Lower body mass index was associated with a greater odds of fusion at 12 weeks (AOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99). Surgeons allowed weightbearing earlier with dorsal plate fixation (2 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 2.6) versus 5 weeks (IQR 2.6) for crossed screw fixation, p = .001). Patients with multiple medical comorbidities were more likely to require revision surgery than patients having 0-1 comorbidities (p < .05). Crossed screws can provide an inexpensive yet effective option for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis.

Sliding Oblique Metatarsal Osteotomy Fixated With a K-Wire Without Cheilectomy for Hallux Rigidus.

The current study aimed to assess the outcomes of sliding oblique metatarsal osteotomy fixated with a K-wire without cheilectomy for hallux rigidus. Pre- and postoperative variables, including dorsiflexion angle, visual analog scale score, and Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scale score, were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In addition, the surgical effects among the four grades were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. In total, 43 patients, including 11, 11, 15, and 6 with grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 hallux rigidus, respectively, were enrolled in this analysis. The mean age of the participants was 56.2 years, and the mean follow-up period was 3.0 years. Mean pre- and postoperative dorsiflexion angles were as follows: overall, 53.0° to 66.5° (p < .001); grade 1, 66.8° to 79.1°; grade 2, 59.1° to 68.6°; grade 3, 43.3° to 61.0°; and grade 4, 40.8° to 53.3°. Mean pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores were as follows: overall, 70.1 to 6.5 (p < .001); grade 1, 74.2 to 3.0; grade 2, 66.4 to 7.6; grade 3, 69.5 to 8.4; and grade 4, 71.2 to 6.0. Finally, mean pre- and postoperative Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scale scores were as follows: overall, 61.2 to 86.6 (p < .001); grade 1, 63.8 to 93.6; grade 2, 68.3 to 85.9; grade 3, 54.4 to 83.1; and grade 4, 60.5 to 83.5. There was no statistically significant difference in the surgical effects among the four grades. Decompressive metatarsal osteotomy without cheilectomy was found to be effective. Moreover, the procedure could be performed for all grades of hallux rigidus.